# $Id: congen_input.txt 6739 2018-01-14 17:00:58Z flaterco $ # Congen input to generate constituents for harmonics. # # Format of input: # For basic constituents: # name Basic T s h p p1 c xi v vp dvpp Q R f# # For compound constituents (trailing zeroes are optional): # name Compound O1 K1 P1 M2 S2 N2 L2 K2 Q1 NU2 S1 M1-DUTCH LDA2 # For comment lines: # # blah blah blah # For approximated Doodson constituents: # name Doodson T s h p p1 c numsatellites # ... followed by IOS style satellite records ... # # Overview # -------- # # Congen and the congen_input.txt file were designed originally to # implement the system used by the US National Ocean Service (NOS), aka the # Darwin system. Support for Doodson-style constituents as used by Mike # Foreman's original IOS package is only approximate; most importantly, # latitude-dependent satellites are discarded. The International # Hydrographic Organization (IHO) has yet another way of calculating node # factors which is not supported at all. # # The first 37 constituents in this file are those that the NOS # historically used for most stations, with names as they appeared in Ed # Wallner's TIDES4 program and in the original IOS tidal package. After # that, constituents were simply appended if and when they were needed to # make use of data from disparate sources, with names either as appearing # therein or as previously defined herein. Those seeking a more cohesive # list of constituents with some logical ordering might consult one of the # following sources: # # [IHO] "Standard list of tidal constituents" from the Tide, Water Level # and Current Working Group (TWCWG) of the IHO, rev. 2017-05, lists many # constituents ordered by speed along with their Extended Doodson Numbers # (XDO). # # [SP98] Manual of Harmonic Analysis and Prediction of Tides. Special # Publication No. 98, Revised (1940) Edition (reprinted 1958 with # corrections; reprinted again 1994). Table 2 summarizes all of the # constituents used in SP98. # # NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS CO-OPS 0021, "Tidal current analysis # procedures and associated computer programs," 1999-03, contains a table # of 175 constituents "in standard order," but the standard is not # identified. # # For details of Congen operation please consult the README file. # # Nomenclature # ------------ # # Most constituents end with a digit that indicates their species (number # of cycles per day), which also is the coefficient of T. The exceptions # are: # # - In this file we add a hyphen and a suffix to distinguish conflicting # definitions with the same name, such as OQ2 and OQ2-HORN. # # - Table 2 in SP98 assigns a serial reference number of the form ANN or # BNN to many constituents that do not have assigned symbols. In the # absence of another name, these reference numbers get used. # # - H1 is an alias for ALP2 and has T=2. # # Changes (2018-01) # ----------------- # # There were no changes to congen_input.txt between August 2004 and January # 2018. The purpose of the 2018-01 revision is to incorporate the findings # of an investigation into discrepant constituents in National Ocean # Service data which specifically affect station 9455920, Anchorage, # Alaska. # # The definition of constituent 3KM5 has been changed from 3K1+M2 to # K1+M2+K2. This approximately reverses its phase and alters its node # factors. Although the superseded definition was consistent with IHO # (2017), the new definition is the one that was used in the paper that # introduced the use of many constituents for Anchorage (Bernard D. Zetler # and Robert A. Cummings, A harmonic method for predicting shallow-water # tides, J. Marine Res. 25(1), pp. 103-114, 1967) and is also the one used # by IOS (2006). # # The new constituent KJ2-IHO is simply a phase reversal of the SP98 # definition of KJ2 to make it consistent with IHO and the NOS data for # Anchorage. As defined in this file, KJ2 and ETA2 are two different # formulations of what IHO and IOS call ETA2. KJ2 is one of the # constituents that is inferred by libtcd using an SP98 rule-of-thumb which # assumes a consistent treatment of the constituents' phases; flipping KJ2 # from its SP98 definition would be more likely to break this inference # than to fix it. # # A third discrepancy was resolved without changes to this file. The # definitions of RP1 and PSI1 (which are the same thing but flipped 180 # degrees) are consistent with IHO, with the SP98 definition of PSI1, and # with the IOS definition of PSI1. To reduce error for Anchorage, the RP1 # constituent is just mapped to PSI1 by the import program of Harmbase2. # # Quirks in SP98 and the NOS system # --------------------------------- # # NOS node factors for M1 contain a historical error that make them about # 50% greater than they should be. M1 amplitudes in harmonic constants # from NOS are correspondingly smaller to compensate. # # M1 has two formulas in SP 98 Table 2. The first yields the correct speed # for the constituent, while the second yields the correct equilibrium # arguments (SP 98 p. 42). The correct thing to do *here* is to use the # second formula since Congen automatically compensates the speed when the # Q variable gets a nonzero multiplier. # M1 Basic 1 -1 1 0 0 -90 1 -1 0 0 1 0 206 # Speed = 14.4966939 # # About M1 Wallner wrote: # In SP98, "Manual of Harmonic Analysis and Prediction of Tides" two # approaches are given for M1, which is a combination of two terms in # Darwin's theory, A16 and A23. (Why wasn't A71 included in the # combination? It is labelled (M1) in Table 2, its speed is half that of # M2 and its coefficient is larger than that of A16 or A23!!) # # V0 for the first is T -s +h +p -90° and u is -nu -Qu. # V0 for the second is T -s +h -90° and u is xi -nu +Q. # # The terms Qu and Q are such that the equilibrium arguments at the start # of the prediction interval are the same but the variable p is absorbed # in Q in the second method and held fixed for the interval. Not only are # there two approaches, alternate formulas are given for some equations # in which some elements are replaced by their mean values. The tables in # SP98 use these approximations. # # MSF or MSf is not derived using the formula in Table 2 but is actually SM # (S2-M2); see SP98 p. 48. This causes u to be nonzero. # # KJ2 is phase-reversed from its IHO definition and matches IHO's ETA2 at # least as far as speed and equilibrium arguments. The IOS ETA2 is a close # match. # # OO2 appears to be a mistranscription of OQ2, specifically the one that # herein is defined as OQ2-HORN. # # Aliases and conflicts # --------------------- # # The "Explanation of symbols used in this book" at the end of SP98 # contains several statements to the effect that one constituent is the # same as another: # # Claim IHO list congen_input.txt # Theta1 = LambdaO1 Opposite phase, nodes j, x No LambdaO1 # Mu2 = 2MS2 Agree? nodes m, x No 2MS2 # Pi1 = TK1 Agree? nodes z, x Eq args and nodes differ # Rho1 = NuK1 Agree? nodes o, x No NuK1 # Sigma1 = NuJ1 Agree! No NuJ1 # Phi1 = KP1 Agree? nodes j, x Eq args and nodes differ # Chi1 = LP1 Opposite phase, nodes j, x No LP1 # Psi1 = RP1 Opposite phase, nodes z, x Opposite phase # # (I have not computed the IHO nodal corrections to determine in which # cases the two letters quoted above indicate the same result.) # # Constituent names are unreliable identifiers. The IHO list contains # enough examples where the same name has multiple, conflicting # definitions. Data sets may use idiosyncratic constituents or just # idiosyncratic names for already-defined constituents. # # Sequences of letters get permuted, such as 3MSN10 in lieu of 3MNS10. # # The reduction of Greek letters to flat ASCII is arbitrary and prone to # aliasing. NU and V get interchanged a lot. # # H1 is an alias for ALP2; H2 is an alias for BET2. # # The Canadian and NOS systems have some subtle differences and some not so # subtle. Constituents SA-IOS, MF-IOS, S1-IOS, OO1-IOS, and R2-IOS # approximate Canadian definitions that clash with NOS definitions having # the same name. # # As defined in this file, some pairs of constituents appear to be Darwin # and Doodson formulations of the same underlying constituent or very # similar constituents. The different formulations produce differences in # equilibrium arguments and node factors which may be genuine or may be # artifacts of the latitude-dependent satellites being discarded by Congen. # # MNS2 and EPS2 IHO: nodes x, m # KQ1 and UPS1 IHO: nodes x, d # # BET1 may match the unused A19 constituent in SP98 Table 2. # # The IHO list has two definitions of MP1 and one of TAU1 that all have the # same speed. As defined in this file, MP1 and TAU1 have significantly # different equilibrium arguments and node factors. # # Speed collisions between different compound constituents are not so rare; # quite a few exist in this file. Sometimes they are approximately # equivalent and sometimes they are not. # # Other definitions of M1 / NO1 # ----------------------------- # # Canada uses NO1 = N2 - O1. They don't use a constituent named M1. # # Regarding Japan's M1, Wallner wrote (1997): # The text with the Japanese constituents I got a little over two year # ago gives the argument of M1 as T - s + h - 90 as in the second NOS # definition. The node factor f and phase u are defined by: # f cos(u) = 2 * cos(p) + 0.4 cos(p-N) # f sin(u) = sin(p) + 0.2 sin(p-N) # This gives essentially the NOS values. # # Upon further review in year 2000, Wallner wrote: # The Japanese u and f are reasonably close to the second SP98 # formulation. The Japanese constituent phases could be "corrected" to # work with first formulation in TIDES by subtracting p, but since this # is a variable that's not much help. Considering it a new constituent, # or a different version of M1, would work better. The German M1 has the # right speed, half that of M2, but I'm not sure what u and f are for it. # The IHO data set has both M1 and NO1, but again I'm not sure what their # M1 is. The French M1 appears to be NO1 exactly. The Mexican data I # have include another undefined M1. # # Regarding Horn's publications, which have M1 = A71 but also NO1, Casement # wrote: # I can't agree with his notation here. What he calls NO1 is a # lunisolar tide and would be better called M1 - as it is by other # authors. His M1 is in fact a shallow-water tide (= M3 - M2 + # 180°) and would be better called MM1. # # The Dutch define the following constituents: # M1 = SP98 term M1 formula #1 on p. 165 (I have called this M1-DUTCH) # M1A = SP98 term A23 # M1B = SP98 term A16 # M1C = SP98 term A71 # M1D = SP98 term M1 formula #2 on p. 165 # M1A, M1B, and M1D are not used in the data I have received. M1C is. # M1-DUTCH is used indirectly in the building of M7 (complete with # exaggerated node factors). The IOS formulation of M7 is 3.5 * M2! # # M1 is a minor constituent that doesn't deserve to be such an # inconvenience. Future producers of harmonic constants are advised to # abolish M1 and just use NO1. # # Other "problem" constituents # ---------------------------- # # Constituent OQ2 has been defined as # - O1+Q1 (herein called OQ2-HORN, used by Netherlands) # - Ibid. with a 180 degree shift (not included here) # - A different definition used by Canada/IOS (herein called OQ2). # Only the first two appear in the IHO list. # # Mexican data contain A7 and LDA1. Wallner wrote: # The data set in the Anales del Instituto d Geofisica, v14 pp45-69 # (1969) give 47 constituents for 23 stations. There is no LDA1 but both # A4 and A7 are included. These are presumably are those terms in Table 2 # of SP98, which is one of the references in the article. My marginalia # say A4 = MsM and A7 = Mtm. # # ---------------------------------------------------------------------- # # The historical 37 NOS constituents. # J1 Basic 1 1 1 -1 0 -90 0 -1 0 0 0 0 76 K1 Compound 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 K2 Compound 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 L2 Compound 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 M1 Basic 1 -1 1 0 0 -90 1 -1 0 0 1 0 206 M2 Compound 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 M3 Basic 3 -3 3 0 0 0 3 -3 0 0 0 0 149 M4 Compound 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 M6 Compound 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 M8 Compound 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 N2 Compound 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2N2 Basic 2 -4 2 2 0 0 2 -2 0 0 0 0 78 O1 Compound 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OO1 Basic 1 2 1 0 0 -90 -2 -1 0 0 0 0 77 P1 Compound 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Q1 Compound 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2Q1 Basic 1 -4 1 2 0 90 2 -1 0 0 0 0 75 R2 Basic 2 0 1 0 -1 180 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 S1 Basic 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 S2 Compound 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 S4 Compound 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 S6 Compound 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 T2 Basic 2 0 -1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 LDA2 Basic 2 -1 0 1 0 180 2 -2 0 0 0 0 78 MU2 Basic 2 -4 4 0 0 0 2 -2 0 0 0 0 78 NU2 Basic 2 -3 4 -1 0 0 2 -2 0 0 0 0 78 RHO1 Basic 1 -3 3 -1 0 90 2 -1 0 0 0 0 75 MK3 Compound 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2MK3 Compound 0 -1 0 2 0 0 0 0 MN4 Compound 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 MS4 Compound 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2SM2 Compound 0 0 0 -1 2 0 0 0 MF Basic 0 2 0 0 0 0 -2 0 0 0 0 0 74 MSF Compound 0 0 0 -1 1 0 0 0 MM Basic 0 1 0 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 73 SA Basic 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 SSA Basic 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 # # IOS clashes with NOS # SA-IOS Doodson 0 0 1 0 -1 0 0 MF-IOS Doodson 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 S1-IOS Doodson 1 0 0 0 1 -90 2 0 0 -2 .0 0.3534 0 1 0 .50 0.0264 OO1-IOS Doodson 1 2 1 0 0 -90 8 -2 -1 0 .50 0.0037 -2 0 0 .0 0.1496 -2 1 0 .0 0.0296 -1 0 0 .25 0.0240R1 -1 1 0 .25 0.0099R1 0 1 0 .0 0.6398 0 2 0 .0 0.1342 0 3 0 .0 0.0086 R2-IOS Doodson 2 0 1 0 -1 180 2 0 0 2 .50 0.2535 0 1 2 .0 0.0141 # # Unusual constituents used in Mexican data # A7 Basic 0 3 0 -1 0 0 -2 0 0 0 0 0 74 # I guessed LambdaO1 (LDA2 - O1), which makes no sense in context # LDA1 Compound -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 # # # Constituents added during the "harmonic convergence" when untraceable # numbers in harmonics.canadian and harmonics.japan were replaced by Congen # output. Descriptions of anomalies found during this process can be found # in the August 2004 version of congen_input.txt. There were several # phase-reversals and several surprising substitutions, all of which now are # moot. # 2MK5 Compound 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 2MK6 Compound 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 2MN2 Compound 0 0 0 2 0 -1 0 0 2MN6 Compound 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 2MS6 Compound 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 2NM6 Compound 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 2SK5 Compound 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 2SM6 Compound 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 3MK7 Compound 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 3MN8 Compound 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 3MS2 Compound 0 0 0 3 -2 0 0 0 3MS4 Compound 0 0 0 3 -1 0 0 0 3MS8 Compound 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 ALP1 Doodson 1 -5 3 1 0 90 2 -1 0 0 .75 0.0360R1 0 -1 0 .00 0.1906 BET1 Doodson 1 -1 -1 1 0 -90 1 0 -1 0 .00 0.2266 CHI1 Basic 1 -1 3 -1 0 -90 0 -1 0 0 0 0 76 H1 Doodson 2 -2 1 0 1 180 2 0 -1 0 .50 0.0224 1 0 -1 .50 0.0447 H2 Doodson 2 -2 3 0 -1 0 1 0 -1 0 .50 0.0217 KJ2 Basic 2 1 2 -1 0 0 0 -2 0 0 0 0 79 ETA2 Doodson 2 1 2 -1 0 0 7 0 -1 0 .50 0.0187 0 1 0 .0 0.4355 0 2 0 .0 0.0467 1 0 0 .75 0.0747R2 1 1 0 .75 0.0482R2 1 2 0 .75 0.0093R2 2 0 0 .50 0.0078 KQ1 Basic 1 3 1 -1 0 -90 -2 -1 0 0 0 0 77 UPS1 Doodson 1 3 1 -1 0 -90 5 -2 0 0 .00 0.0611 0 1 0 .00 0.6399 0 2 0 .00 0.1318 1 0 0 .25 0.0289R1 1 1 0 .25 0.0257R1 M10 Compound 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 M12 Compound 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 MK4 Compound 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 MKS2 Compound 0 0 0 1 -1 0 0 1 MNS2 Compound 0 0 0 1 -1 1 0 0 EPS2 Doodson 2 -5 4 1 0 0 3 -1 -1 0 .25 0.0075R2 -1 0 0 .25 0.0402R2 0 -1 0 .50 0.0373 MO3 Compound 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 MP1 Basic 1 -2 3 0 0 -90 0 -1 0 0 0 0 76 TAU1 Doodson 1 -2 3 0 0 -90 5 -2 0 0 .0 0.0446 -1 0 0 .25 0.0426R1 0 -1 0 .50 0.0284 0 1 0 .50 0.2170 0 2 0 .50 0.0142 MPS2 Compound 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 -1 MSK6 Compound 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 MSM Basic 0 1 -2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 73 MSN2 Compound 0 0 0 1 1 -1 0 0 MSN6 Compound 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 NLK2 Compound 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 -1 NO1 Compound -1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 OP2 Compound 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 OQ2 Doodson 2 -5 2 3 0 0 2 -1 0 0 .25 0.1042R2 0 -1 0 .50 0.0386 PHI1 Basic 1 0 3 0 0 -90 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 KP1 Compound 0 0 -1 0 0 0 0 1 PI1 Basic 1 0 -2 0 1 90 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 TK1 Basic 1 0 -2 0 1 90 0 0 1 0 0 0 227 PSI1 Basic 1 0 2 0 -1 -90 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 RP1 Basic 1 0 2 0 -1 90 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 S3 Basic 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 SIG1 Basic 1 -4 3 0 0 90 2 -1 0 0 0 0 75 SK3 Compound 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 SK4 Compound 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 SN4 Compound 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 SNK6 Compound 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 SO1 Basic 1 2 -1 0 0 -90 0 -1 0 0 0 0 76 SO3 Compound 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 THE1 Basic 1 1 -1 1 0 -90 0 -1 0 0 0 0 76 # # Remaining constituents merged from harmonics.anchorage 2001-01 # 2PO1 Compound -1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2NS2 Compound 0 0 0 0 -1 2 0 0 MLN2S2 Compound 0 0 0 1 -2 1 1 0 2ML2S2 Compound 0 0 0 2 -2 0 1 0 SKM2 Compound 0 0 0 -1 1 0 0 1 2MS2K2 Compound 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 -2 MKL2S2 Compound 0 0 0 1 -2 0 1 1 M2(KS)2 Compound 0 0 0 1 -2 0 0 2 2SN(MK)2 Compound 0 0 0 -1 2 1 0 -1 2KM(SN)2 Compound 0 0 0 1 -1 -1 0 2 NO3 Compound 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2MLS4 Compound 0 0 0 2 -1 0 1 0 ML4 Compound 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 N4 Compound 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 SL4 Compound 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 MNO5 Compound 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 2MO5 Compound 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 MSK5 Compound 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 # 2018-01 definition change # Old definition = 3K1+M2 # 3KM5 Compound 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 # -> Basic 5 -2 5 0 0 90 = IHO definition, XDO 5 855 554 # New definition = K1+M2+K2 3KM5 Compound 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 2MP5 Compound 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 3MP5 Compound 0 0 -1 3 0 0 0 0 MNK5 Compound 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 2NMLS6 Compound 0 0 0 1 -1 2 1 0 MSL6 Compound 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 2ML6 Compound 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 2MNLS6 Compound 0 0 0 2 -1 1 1 0 3MLS6 Compound 0 0 0 3 -1 0 1 0 2MNO7 Compound 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 2NMK7 Compound 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 2MSO7 Compound 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 MSKO7 Compound 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 2MSN8 Compound 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 2(MS)8 Compound 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 2(MN)8 Compound 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 2MSL8 Compound 0 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 4MLS8 Compound 0 0 0 4 -1 0 1 0 3ML8 Compound 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 3MK8 Compound 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 2MSK8 Compound 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 2M2NK9 Compound 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 0 3MNK9 Compound 0 1 0 3 0 1 0 0 4MK9 Compound 0 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 3MSK9 Compound 0 1 0 3 1 0 0 0 4MN10 Compound 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 3MNS10 Compound 0 0 0 3 1 1 0 0 4MS10 Compound 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 3MSL10 Compound 0 0 0 3 1 0 1 0 3M2S10 Compound 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 4MSK11 Compound 0 1 0 4 1 0 0 0 4MNS12 Compound 0 0 0 4 1 1 0 0 5MS12 Compound 0 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 4MSL12 Compound 0 0 0 4 1 0 1 0 4M2S12 Compound 0 0 0 4 2 0 0 0 # # Other constituents needed by Dutch data 2001-01 # # M1C is A71 in Table 2 of SP98 M1C Basic 1 -1 1 0 0 0 1 -1 0 0 0 0 144 3MKS2 Compound 0 0 0 3 -1 0 0 -1 OQ2-HORN Compound 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 MSK2 Compound 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 -1 MSP2 Compound 0 0 -1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2MP3 Compound 0 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 4MS4 Compound 0 0 0 4 -2 0 0 0 2MNS4 Compound 0 0 0 2 -1 1 0 0 2MSK4 Compound 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 -1 3MN4 Compound 0 0 0 3 0 -1 0 0 2MSN4 Compound 0 0 0 2 1 -1 0 0 3MK5 Compound 0 -1 0 3 0 0 0 0 3MO5 Compound -1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3MNS6 Compound 0 0 0 3 -1 1 0 0 4MS6 Compound 0 0 0 4 -1 0 0 0 2MNU6 Compound 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 3MSK6 Compound 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 -1 MKNU6 Compound 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 3MSN6 Compound 0 0 0 3 1 -1 0 0 M7 Compound 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2MNK8 Compound 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 2(MS)N10 Compound 0 0 0 2 2 1 0 0 # # Other constituents needed by German data 2004-08-11 # # This is indistinguishable from NO3 # MQ3 Compound 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 MNUS2 Compound 0 0 0 1 -1 0 0 0 0 1 2MK2 Compound 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 -1 # # Added 2018-01 # KJ2-IHO Basic 2 1 2 -1 0 180 0 -2 0 0 0 0 79